UNESCO-NIE Centre for Arts Research in Education (CARE)

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Journal: 
NJ (Drama Australia Journal)
Name(s) of Author/Editor(s): 
Jonathan Neelands
Refereed: 
Yes
Volume No.: 
33
Issue No.: 
1
Page numbers of article: 
9-18
Year of publication: 
2009
Country of publication: 
Australia
Country of Research Data: 
Australia and United Kingdom
Language: 
English
Abstract: 

This paper examines two quite different examples of drama and theatre education in order to identify how drama curricula are shaped, both by external forces and by a common pedagogic and artistic tradition or trajectory. The paper argues that the first and most significant shaping of curriculum is in response to the ideological and political imperatives of the government in power and that this shaping shifts in response to shifts in the field of power. However, the paper argues for maintaining a critical and pro-social pedagogy as the core of any drama curriculum, whatever its technical appearance might be. This pedagogy is identified through the two cases and is placed in a wider context of pedagogic and artistic thought and practice with the suggestion that by better understanding how the rich traditions of drama and theatre education sit within a broader struggle to give young people pro-social and critical pedagogic and artistic opportunities, drama can strengthen its resolve during periods of curriculum reform.

Start New Search

Browse by Category

Browse by Type

Submissions

Do you have an article or research paper relating to arts education? Submit to our database!

Social Media

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter

https://www.facebook.com/NIECARESG

https://twitter.com/NIECARESG